Xianren Cave
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ōdai Yamamoto I Site
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Odai Yamamoto I site)
Ōdai Yamamoto I Site - Wikipedia
Quaternary International
Volume 441, Part B, 20 June 2017, Pages 29-35
The origins of pottery in East Asia and neighboring regions: An analysis based on radiocarbon data
Author links open overlay panel Yaroslav V.Kuzminab
Show more
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2016.10.011
Abstract
Patterns for the emergence of pottery-making in greater East Asia based on radiocarbon dates associated with the earliest pottery assemblages are presented.
According to a critical evaluation of the existing evidence, the oldest centers with pottery in East Asia are located in South China (dated to ca. 18,000 cal BP), the Japanese Islands (ca. 16,700 cal BP), and the Russian Far East (ca. 15,900 cal BP).
The claim for earlier pottery in South China at the Xianrendong Cave, supposedly dated to ca. 20,000 cal BP, cannot be substantiated.
The appearance of pottery in other parts of greater East Asia was a slow process, without clear diffusion from any of these centers toward the periphery.
In neighboring Siberia, the oldest pottery dated to ca. 14,000 cal BP is known from the Transbaikal.
출처;https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618216302567
Quaternary International
Volume 441, Part B, 20 June 2017, Pages 69-80
The earliest pottery of the eastern part of Asia: Similarities and differences
Author links open overlay panel O.V.Yanshina
Show more
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2016.10.035
Abstract
There are many reasons why the earliest pottery of East Asia is so interesting for researchers.
one of them is that it is a unique source for reconstruction of cultural diversity within Late Pleistocene.
According to Russian archaeologists, for such reconstruction it is necessary to find out how pots were made (clay paste composition, way of shaping, surface treatment, firing and decorating) and how pots looked.
Based on this perspective it is possible to divide the earliest ceramic assemblages of East Asia into three groups.
First of them include the Incipient Jomon ones, their differentia is plain (without rough surface treatment) pottery ornamented by hands (pinch, nail impression, clay application) and a comparatively high level of unification.
Second group comprises Osipovka assemblages compactly located within the Low Amur river basin. They are quite polymorphous but have common distinctive traits such as grog temper, comb design of different pattern and combing surface treatment.
The third group is the most extended and diverse. Its key feature is only cord surface treatment in a very special manner of rolling of a cord wrapped stick.
Astoundingly, the assemblages with this trait occupy the territory from southernmost China to Transbaikalia (Studenoe-1, Ust-Karenga), and Middle Amur river basin (Gromatukha).
So, it is possible to say they have Inner-Asia spatial distribution. Thus, we can see three different areas of spatial distribution of earliest ceramic assemblages within the eastern part of Asia.
Tracking their Holocene fate, we can find confirmation of such conclusion and suppose that Sakhalin, North Hokkaido and Russia Maritime form the forth – non-ceramic – area in Late Pleistocene.
출처; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618216304384
Handbook of East and Southeast Asian Archaeology pp 321-345| Cite as
The Development of Pottery and Associated Technological Developments in Japan, Korea, and the Russian Far East
- Simon Kaner
- Yasuhiro Taniguchi
Chapter
First online: 09 December 2017
Abstract
The earliest known dated ceramic containers are from East Asia.
Calibrated radiocarbon dates for the Japanese archipelago and the Russian Far East indicate that pottery was being made at least 15,000 years ago, with even earlier claims for China, firmly in the late Pleistocene, prior to the climatic changes that marked the start of the Holocene.
The greatest number of sites is from the Japanese archipelago, where a series of chronological phases have been identified in the development of ceramic technology and design, associated with particular pottery styles.
This paper reviews the cultural contexts for the invention and subsequent innovation of ceramic containers in the region, and surveys recent advances in scientific method including the analysis of food residues.
The approach adopted in this chapter argues that social agency and historical contingency played an important role in the development of ceramic technology, and that other factors, including climate change and the development of sedentary lifestyles constrained rather than determined the trajectory of ceramic innovation.
출처; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4939-6521-2_22